//Rape is a crime against basic human rights: SC

Rape is a crime against basic human rights: SC

Rape is a crime against basic human rights: SC
New Delhi, Mar 05: [Zeen News Bureau Report]

The Supreme Court has observed that rape was a crime against basic human rights and was violative of the victim`s most cherished fundamental right namely right to life contained in Article 21 of the constitution of India.

A bench comprising Justice Arijit Pasayat and Justice S H Kapadia vide their judgement dated Feb 28, 2006 held that a socially sensitised judge was a better statutory armour in a case of crime against women than long clauses of penal provisions, containing complex exceptions and provisos.

The court`s observations came while reducing the life imprisonment awarded to the appellant Dinesh Buddah for raping an eight-year-old girl by the trial court and confirmed by the high court, to ten years` rigorous imprisonment.

The crime of rape was committed by the victim on Feb 5, 1998 when the victim was returning home after witnessing a marriage procession. The state was also directed to pay a compensation of Rs 50000 to the victim by the court.

Rape is not only a crime against the person of a woman, it is a crime against the entire society. It destroys the entire psychology of a woman and pushes her into deep emotional crisis. Where the victim is a helpless innocent child or a minor, it leaves behind a traumatic experience. The court noted.

The convict had threatened to kill the victim if she disclosed the incident to anyone but when the pain became unbearable for the child she told her sister, mother and grandmother about the incident and the matter was reported to the police.

The minimum sentence prescribed for rape of a child less than 12 years of age is ten years` RI.

The court also observed that the socio-economic status, religion, race, caste or creed of the accused or the victim are irrelevant considerations in sentencing policy.

There are no extenuating or mitigating circumstances available on the record which may justify imposition of any sentence less than the prescribed minimum on the respondent and to show any mercy in the case of such a heinous crime would be a travesty of justice and plea for leniency was wholly misplaced, the court concluded.

The compensation amount would be paid to the victim within 8 weeks if not already paid.